Modeling of Seismic Signatures of Carbonate Rock Types
MetadataShow full item record
Carbonate reservoirs of different rock types have wide ranges of porosity and permeability, creating zones with different reservoir quality and flow properties. This research addresses how seismic technology can be used to identify different carbonate rock types for characterization of reservoir heterogeneity. I also investigated which seismic methods can help delineate thin high-permeability (super-k) layers that cause early water breakthroughs that severely reduce hydrocarbon recovery. Based on data from a Middle East producing field, a typical geologic model is defined including seal, a thin fractured layer, grainstone and wackestone. Convolutional, finite difference, and fluid substitution modeling methods are used to understand the seismic signatures of carbonate rock types. Results show that the seismic reflections from the seal/fractured-layer interface and the fractured-layer/grainstone interface cannot be resolved with conventional seismic data. However, seismic reflection amplitudes from interfaces between different carbonate rock types within the reservoir are strong enough to be identified on seismic data, compared with reflections from both the top and bottom interfaces of the reservoir. The seismic reflection amplitudes from the fractured-layer/grainstone and the grainstone/wackestone interfaces are 17% and 23% of those from the seal/fracturedlayer interface, respectively. By using AVO analysis, it may be possible to predict the presence of the fractured layer. It is observed that seismic reflection amplitude resulting from the interference between the reflections from overburden/seal and seal/fractured-layer does not change with offset. The thin super-k layer can also be identified using fluid substitution method and time-lapse seismic analysis. It shows that this layer has 5% increase in acoustic impedance after oil is fully replaced by injecting water in the layer. This causes 11% decrease and 87% increase in seismic reflection amplitudes from the seal/fractured-layer interface and the fractured-layer/grainstone interface after fluid substitution, respectively. These results show that it is possible to predict carbonate rock types, including thin super-k layers, using their seismic signatures, when different seismic techniques are used together, such as synthetic wave modeling, AVO, and time-lapse analysis. In future work, the convolutional model, AVO analysis, and fluid substitution could be applied to real seismic data for field verification and production monitoring.
Jan, Badr H. (2009). Modeling of Seismic Signatures of Carbonate Rock Types. Master's thesis, Texas A&M University. Available electronically from