Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorEriksson, Marian
dc.contributor.advisorPopescu, Sorin
dc.creatorMarcell, Wesley Tyler
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-22T22:23:38Z
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-22T23:44:45Z
dc.date.available2011-02-22T22:23:38Z
dc.date.available2011-02-22T23:44:45Z
dc.date.created2009-12
dc.date.issued2011-02-22
dc.date.submittedDecember 2009
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2009-12-7302
dc.description.abstractProof of concept lidar research has, to date, examined wall-to-wall models of forest ecosystems. While these studies have been important for verifying lidars efficacy for forest surveys, complete coverage is likely not the most cost effective means of using lidar as auxiliary data for operational surveys; sampling of some sort being the better alternative. This study examines the effectiveness of sampling with high point-density scanning lidar data and shows that systematic sampling is a better alternative to simple random sampling. It examines the bias and mean squared error of various estimators, and concludes that a linear-trend-based and especially an autocorrelation-assisted variance estimator perform better than the commonly used simple random sampling based-estimator when sampling is systematic.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectLidaren
dc.subjectSystematicen
dc.subjectSamplingen
dc.titleSystematic Sampling of Scanning Lidar Swathsen
dc.typeBooken
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentEcosystem Science and Managementen
thesis.degree.disciplineForestryen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMorgan, Cristine
dc.contributor.committeeMemberNelson, Ross
dc.type.genreElectronic Thesisen
dc.type.materialtexten


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record