Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMcCleery, Robert A.
dc.contributor.advisorSilvy, Nova J.
dc.creatorSchmidt, Jason Alan
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-22T22:23:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-22T23:44:24Z
dc.date.available2011-02-22T22:23:34Z
dc.date.available2011-02-22T23:44:24Z
dc.date.created2009-12
dc.date.issued2011-02-22
dc.date.submittedDecember 2009
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2009-12-7269
dc.description.abstractWildlife biologists and land managers tasked with the recovery of the endangered Lower Keys marsh rabbit (LKMR; Sylvilagus palustris hefneri) were in need of a current population estimate as well as a method to estimate the LKMR population annually. Habitat loss and fragmentation from population growth and development have threatened the existence of the LKMR. Establishing and understanding long-term habitat availability for the LKMR is important for determining causes of historical population declines as well as designing and implementing successful recovery plans. I conducted a range-wide pellet survey and a mark-recapture study to estimate the LKMR population. I evaluated the fit of 5 models and considered the variation in behavioral response model the best model. I correlated (r2 = 0.913) this model's rabbit abundance estimates to pellet density in 11 patches and generated a range-wide population estimate of 317, a western clade population of 257, an eastern clade population of 25, and translocated LKMR populations of 35 and 0 on Little Pine and Water keys, respectively. This prediction equation provides managers a quick, efficient, and non-invasive method to estimate LKMR abundance from pellet counts. To quantify the amount of habitat loss and fragmentation that occurred over the last 50 years, I systematically delineated and compared potential LKMR habitat using 1959 and 2006 aerial photographs. Additionally, I investigated if other factors could have reduced the amount of suitable habitat available for the LKMR with a comparison of habitat loss and fragmentation on a developed island and an undeveloped island. Range-wide, I found that number of habitat patches increased by 38, total class area decreased by 49.0%, and mean patch size decreased by 44.3%. Mean shape index increased by 4.2% and mean proximity index decreased by 13%. Both the 1959 and 2006 connectance indices were low while the 2006 set decreased 12.1%. I observed the same patterns of habitat loss and fragmentation on both the developed and undeveloped islands as I did in the range-wide landscape analysis. I found that LKMR habitat has declined in area and become more fragmented over the last 50 years. Habitat loss and fragmentation by development have directly endangered the LKMR; however, sea level rise and woody encroachment also could have historically caused habitat loss and fragmentation. Although development in LKMR habitat was halted, sea-level rise and woody encroachment could continue to alter LKMR habitat.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectLower Keys marsh rabbiten
dc.subjectpopulation estimateen
dc.subjectmark-recaptureen
dc.subjectpellet countsen
dc.subjectFlorida Keysen
dc.subjectendangered speciesen
dc.subjectSylvilagus palustris hefnerien
dc.subjecthabitat fragmentationen
dc.subjectlagomorphsen
dc.subjectpatch metricsen
dc.titlePopulation Status and Evaluation of Landscape Change for the Lower Keys Marsh Rabbiten
dc.typeBooken
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentWildlife and Fisheries Sciencesen
thesis.degree.disciplineWildlife and Fisheries Sciencesen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLopez, Roel R.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberFeagin, Rusty A.
dc.type.genreElectronic Thesisen
dc.type.materialtexten


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record