Show simple item record

dc.creatorHudson, Robert Wayne
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-22T20:40:44Z
dc.date.available2013-02-22T20:40:44Z
dc.date.created2003
dc.date.issued2013-02-22
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2003-Fellows-Thesis-H8422
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 19-21).en
dc.description.abstractIn every criminal case, the selection of jurors is a crucial factor in determining the outcome of the trial. The prosecution and the defense each attempt to construct a jury that will be sympathetic to their arguments. Each side interviews the prospective jurors and attempts to eliminate those people who might be partial to the opposition. Because attorneys have the opportunity to select the jurors, proper evaluation of each candidate is imperative. In many cases, the allocation of punishment is a responsibility given to the jurors. A variety of factors contribute to the decisions that individual jurors make concerning sentence severity. One of these factors may be the degree to which a juror can relate to the defendant. This research intends to analyze how the similarity between a defendant and a juror influences juror decision-making. The deep characteristic of personality and the surface characteristic of sex serve as the comparison between the defendant and jurors for this study. Furthermore, the way in which different types of crimes influence sentence severity is analyzed. This study analyzes the ways in which personality, sex, type of crime, and defendant-juror similarity affect judgments of punishment.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectpsychology.en
dc.subjectMajor psychology.en
dc.titleThe effects of defendant and juror similarity on sentencing for university undergraduate research fellowsen
thesis.degree.departmentpsychologyen
thesis.degree.disciplinepsychologyen
thesis.degree.nameFellows Thesisen
thesis.degree.levelUndergraduateen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record