NOTE: Restrictions are in place to limit access to one or more of the files associated with this item. Authorized users must log in to gain access. Non-authorized users do not have access to these files.
Visit the Energy Systems Laboratory Homepage.
dc.creator | King, L. T. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-04-23T18:07:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-04-23T18:07:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1984 | |
dc.identifier.other | ESL-IE-84-04-142 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/94656 | |
dc.description.abstract | The efficient mixing of materials is a basic requirement at some stage of most processes. Examples of unit operations include mixers, blenders, heat exchangers and reactors that often use dynamic mixers. Motionless mixers on the other hand contain no moving parts. The only power involved in their use is that associated with the small pressure drop produced by their insertion into a tube or pipe. Energy savings are typically 75% to 90% when compared to mechanical mixers. Case histories are described. | en |
dc.publisher | Energy Systems Laboratory (http://esl.tamu.edu) | |
dc.publisher | Texas A&M University (http://www.tamu.edu) | |
dc.subject | Motionless Mixing | en |
dc.subject | Energy Savings | en |
dc.subject | Mechanical Mixers | en |
dc.title | Unit Operation Efficiency Improvement Through Motionless Mixing | en |
dc.contributor.sponsor | Komax Systems, Inc. |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
IETC - Industrial Energy Technology Conference
Industrial Energy Technology Conference