NOTE: Restrictions are in place to limit access to one or more of the files associated with this item. Authorized users must log in to gain access. Non-authorized users do not have access to these files.
Visit the Energy Systems Laboratory Homepage.
| dc.creator | Kumar, A. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-04-11T15:35:34Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2011-04-11T15:35:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1981 | |
| dc.identifier.other | ESL-IE-81-04-34 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/94418 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The largest single area for industrial energy conservation is in the improvement of combustion efficiencies for heaters and boilers. A number of methods can be employed to recover heat. The most common are by use of recuperative air preheaters, regenerative air preheaters and economizers. Relative advantages and applicability of the three methods are discussed. Analytical methods and correlations are presented which enable determination of size of unit, capital cost and operating cost for each of the three methods of heat recovery. | en |
| dc.publisher | Energy Systems Laboratory (http://esl.tamu.edu) | |
| dc.publisher | Texas A&M University (http://www.tamu.edu) | |
| dc.subject | Heaters and Boilers | en |
| dc.subject | Combustion Efficiency | en |
| dc.subject | Heat Recovery | en |
| dc.subject | Air Preheaters and Economizers | en |
| dc.title | Potential For Energy Conservation | en |
| dc.contributor.sponsor | Bechtel Company |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
IETC - Industrial Energy Technology Conference
Industrial Energy Technology Conference