Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPemberton, H. Brent
dc.contributor.advisorByrne, David
dc.creatorWang, Yuhui
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-27T16:43:15Z
dc.date.available2023-12-01T09:23:58Z
dc.date.created2021-12
dc.date.issued2021-12-07
dc.date.submittedDecember 2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/196375
dc.description.abstractSpent flower removal is commonly practiced on remontant garden roses as a landscape management tool to hasten rebloom. To study the effects of spent flower removal on the reblooming and branching architecture of garden roses, four Shrub rose cultivars were established in the field in February 2019 and treatments were started in June 2019 at Somerville and Overton with the same treatments and controls in each cultivar. Spent flower removal had no effect on the days to rebloom between flushes of flowering. ‘Belinda’s Dream’ had the longest reblooming period. The current season growth and primary shoot number were not affected by spent flower removal. Plants in Somerville exhibited a higher number of secondary and tertiary shoots than in Overton regardless of cultivar and more quaternary shoots on some cultivars than those in Overton. This is likely attributable to the longer growing season in Somerville than in Overton. An important aspect of heat tolerance of ornamental plants is the response of the flowers to high temperature. Commercial garden rose cultivars with buds 4 mm in diameter were exposed to temperatures of 36, 40, or 44 ˚C for durations of 1, 3, or 5 h in factorial combination in a heat chamber and compared to untreated controls to determine the effects of heat on floral parameters including petal number, flower diameter and flower dry weight when flowers were fully open. The number of treatments different from the control determined using Dunnett’s test and the parameters affected by the temperature × duration factors as determined by ANOVA were used to categorize the cultivars studied. Dry weight was the most sensitive parameter measured. ‘CHEwnicebell’ and ‘ZLEMarianne Yoshida’ were categorized as Heat Sensitive cultivars, ‘Winnipeg Parks’ was categorized as Moderately Heat Susceptible. ‘Morden Blush’, ‘Meipeporia’ and ‘RADrazz’ was considered as Moderately Heat Tolerant cultivars. ‘RADtko’ and ‘RIPhud’ were not affected by the heat treatments and were categorized as Heat Tolerant cultivars. Exposure of plants with buds 4 mm in diameter to 44 ˚C for 3 or 5h was the most effective treatment for determining floral heat tolerance for the cultivars studied.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectGarden rose
dc.subjectPlant branching architecture
dc.subjectFloral heat tolerance
dc.subjectFlower diameter
dc.subjectFlower dry weight
dc.subjectPetal number
dc.titleThe Effects of Spent Flower Removal on Reblooming and Branching Architecture and the Characterization of Floral Heat Tolerance of Garden Roses
dc.typeThesis
thesis.degree.departmentHorticultural Sciences
thesis.degree.disciplineHorticulture
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M University
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science
thesis.degree.levelMasters
dc.contributor.committeeMemberNiu, Genhua
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKlein, Patricia
dc.type.materialtext
dc.date.updated2022-07-27T16:43:16Z
local.embargo.terms2023-12-01
local.etdauthor.orcid0000-0003-2485-1427


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record