Show simple item record

dc.creatorAllen, Jackson L.
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-03T16:36:19Z
dc.date.available2021-09-03T16:36:19Z
dc.date.created2013-05
dc.date.issued2013-02-05
dc.date.submittedMay 2013
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/194508
dc.description.abstractThe Supreme Court is an institution much revered in American political culture. This study will examine the role of that public support in the decision making of Supreme Court justices in the United States. I will go about assessing this first by measuring the level of public support for the Supreme Court as measured by the General Social Survey (GSS) and cross-tabulating it with data on the frequency of legislation invalidation. Ultimately, I show that the Supreme Court does in fact respond to public opinion, using public support as a power base to strike down a greater number of federal laws. In other words, the Supreme Court is more likely to invalidate a law when it is more popular than the incumbent legislature. My results indicate that there is, in fact, a positive and significant correlation in the data that supports our hypothesis.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.subjectJudicial Politicsen
dc.subjectAmerican Politicsen
dc.subjectSupreme Court of the United Statesen
dc.titleThe Separation of Powers: Does Public Opinion Matter to the Supreme Court?en
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentPolitical Scienceen
thesis.degree.disciplinePolitical Scienceen
thesis.degree.grantorUndergraduate Research Scholars Programen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberUra, Joseph D
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.date.updated2021-09-03T16:36:19Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record