dc.creator | Alvi, Taimoor | |
dc.creator | Haffey, Colton | |
dc.creator | Huddleston, Mary | |
dc.creator | Parks, Emily | |
dc.creator | Prieto, Bill | |
dc.creator | Reed, Austin | |
dc.creator | Sadiq, Hamza | |
dc.creator | Smith, Carolyn | |
dc.creator | Vatthauer, Matthew | |
dc.creator | Zahid, Maheen | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-09T16:40:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-09T16:40:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-05 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/188113 | |
dc.description | Texas has an estimated need of $20 million in non-federal funding in order to receive $60 million in federal funding from the proposed Recovering America’s Wildlife Act. By exploring Texas’s political culture and surveying stakeholders, this student Capstone team report analyzes and proposes the best possible options to fund wildlife conservation based on the criteria of feasibility and sustainability. | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Mosbacher Institute for Trade, Economics & Public Policy | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Volume 11;Issue 7 | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | Texas wildlife | en |
dc.subject | conservation funding | en |
dc.subject | Recovering America’s Wildlife Act | en |
dc.title | Sustainable Funding Options for Texas Wildlife Conservation | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.contributor.sponsor | Bush School of Government and Public Service | |