Show simple item record

dc.creatorAlvi, Taimoor
dc.creatorHaffey, Colton
dc.creatorHuddleston, Mary
dc.creatorParks, Emily
dc.creatorPrieto, Bill
dc.creatorReed, Austin
dc.creatorSadiq, Hamza
dc.creatorSmith, Carolyn
dc.creatorVatthauer, Matthew
dc.creatorZahid, Maheen
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-09T16:40:51Z
dc.date.available2020-06-09T16:40:51Z
dc.date.issued2020-05
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/188113
dc.descriptionTexas has an estimated need of $20 million in non-federal funding in order to receive $60 million in federal funding from the proposed Recovering America’s Wildlife Act. By exploring Texas’s political culture and surveying stakeholders, this student Capstone team report analyzes and proposes the best possible options to fund wildlife conservation based on the criteria of feasibility and sustainability.en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMosbacher Institute for Trade, Economics & Public Policy
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 11;Issue 7
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectTexas wildlifeen
dc.subjectconservation fundingen
dc.subjectRecovering America’s Wildlife Acten
dc.titleSustainable Funding Options for Texas Wildlife Conservationen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.sponsorBush School of Government and Public Service


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • The Takeaway
    Policy Briefs from the Mosbacher Institute for Trade, Economics, and Public Policy

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International