Show simple item record

dc.creatorGriffin, James M.
dc.creatorDahl, Rachel
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-04T23:17:51Z
dc.date.available2015-02-04T23:17:51Z
dc.date.issued2012-10
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/153190
dc.description.abstractBecause of the magnitude of the existing corn harvest shortfall coupled with the large ethanol mandates, policymakers face extreme uncertainties looking into the future with potentially large economic ramifications. Precisely, because neither the economic modelers nor the decision makers can foretell all of the factors affecting corn harvests and ethanol use in 2013, a waiver is a wise course of action. To be sure, a waiver may have no effect and turn out to be irrelevant. Even so, we argue that it has no downside. But if an anemic harvest rebound occurs in 2013, a waiver could avoid substantial economic dislocations in 2013 and beyond. Regulators should opt for flexibility.en
dc.description.sponsorshipBush School of Government and Public Serviceen
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherThe Mosbacher Institute for Trade, Economics & Public Policy
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 3;Issue 2
dc.subjectethanolen
dc.subjectcornen
dc.titleEthanol Waivers: Needed or Irrelevant?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.sponsorBush School of Government and Public Service


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • The Takeaway
    Policy Briefs from the Mosbacher Institute for Trade, Economics, and Public Policy

Show simple item record