Show simple item record

dc.creatorGriffin, James M.
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-04T22:29:15Z
dc.date.available2015-02-04T22:29:15Z
dc.date.issued2010-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/153185
dc.description.abstractIn the wake of the recent oil disaster in the Gulf, Congress appears poised to impose new bans on offshore drilling along with a strict new regulatory regime. While these measures may meet a widely felt need for swift retribution, there is an alternative policy response that can both correctly assign liability and create stronger incentives for uncompromised safety among offshore operators. This article encourages policymakers to keep perspective on probability and cost of offshore drilling accidents and to avoid the temptation to over-regulate, but instead to have offshore operators bear full liability for accidents by removing the current $75 million liability cap and to require offshore operators to provide insurance guaranteeing full liability coverage.en
dc.description.sponsorshipBush School of Government and Public Serviceen
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMosbacher Institute for Trade, Economics & Public Policy
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 1;Issue 1
dc.subjectoilen
dc.subjectoffshore drillingen
dc.subjectregulationen
dc.titleThe Oil Debacle in the Gulf of Mexico: An Alternative to the Coming Flood of Offshore Regulationsen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • The Takeaway
    Policy Briefs from the Mosbacher Institute for Trade, Economics, and Public Policy

Show simple item record