English and American shipboard carpenters, ca. 1725-1825

dc.creatorMcDermott, Brendan Joseph
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T23:00:10Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T23:00:10Z
dc.date.created2000
dc.date.issued2000
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 212-221).en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractMaritime historians who write of life at sea have tended to focus their research either on the seamen or on the chief officers. Little has been said about the group of lesser officers situated between those two groups. These men were mainly specialists who helped maintain the ship and did much to ensure its smooth operation. The carpenter was one such specialist, and this thesis employs an interdisciplinary approach combining history, archaeology, and ethnography to illuminate the shipboard duties of the carpenter, and to explore where he fit in the crew hierarchy; how he was compensated; where he worked and lived aboard ship; what types of tools he used and for what purpose; and even gain a glimpse of his personal character. The historical research consists of a comprehensive review of eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century maritime documentation (e.g., British Admiralty regulations, ships logs, sailors' diaries). The archaeological analysis includes a catalog of artifacts, mainly carpentry tools, from two shipwrecks dating to the American War for Independence: the American privateer Defence in Maine, and the British collier Betsy in Virginia. The ethnographic analysis consists of several surveys from this century of how shipwrights used specific tools in constructing wooden vessels. The evidence indicates that in the various maritime services examined, the Royal Navy, the Continental Navy, the American state navies, the United States Navy, privateers, and merchant ships, all carpenters performed the same basic duties and generally worked under the same conditions. It was in terms of compensation and career possibilities that the Royal Navy seems to have possessed an advantage over the others. As for the specific shipwrecks, it is concluded that Defence had a professional carpenter in its complement, but that Betsy likely had a regular seaman performing those duties.en
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2000-THESIS-M3316
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectanthropology.en
dc.subjectMajor anthropology.en
dc.titleEnglish and American shipboard carpenters, ca. 1725-1825en
dc.typeThesisen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
thesis.degree.disciplineanthropologyen
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
thesis.degree.nameM.A.en

Files