The Accelerated Degradation of Conserved Waterlogged Wood

dc.contributor.advisorSmith, Wayne
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHamilton, Donny L
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWarden, Robert
dc.creatorMartindale, Karen Elizabeth
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-21T16:58:23Z
dc.date.available2015-09-21T16:58:23Z
dc.date.created2015-05
dc.date.issued2015-05-07
dc.date.submittedMay 2015
dc.date.updated2015-09-21T16:58:23Z
dc.description.abstractThere is a great deal of variation in conservation treatments for waterlogged wood. There is also a great deal of variation in the environments where the artifacts are displayed and stored. Accelerated testing could be used as a tool to determine the best treatment for an artifact in a given environment, to adjust the environment to suit the artifact, or as a comparative tool for new conservation treatments. Accelerated testing methods used by manufacturing industries may be too expensive to be commonly used by conservation laboratories, but it is possible for conservation laboratories to create their own accelerated testing chambers that yield accurate comparisons. In this study, the author treats samples of archaeological waterlogged wood using PEG, freeze drying, and silicone oil treatments, then subjects the wood samples to four accelerated environments inside glass chambers. An “ideal” museum environment acts as a control, maintaining a temperature of 20–22°C (68–71.6°F), a relative humidity of 16%−20% using silica gel, and a lighting cycle of five days with light and two days without light; a museum with little environmental control is simulated by using a heated seedling mat to increase the temperature of the chamber to 28–30°C (82.4–86°F), increasing the relative humidity by adding 5 ml of water weekly, and has a lighting cycle of five days with light and two without light; outdoor storage building conditions are simulated by keeping the chamber in an oven programmed to maintain a temperature of 35°C (95°F), increasing relative humidity by adding 5 ml of water weekly, and limiting light; cool storage conditions are simulated by keeping the chamber in a refrigerator that maintains a temperature of 4–6°C (39.2–42.8°F), maintaining a relative humidity of 16%−20% using silica gel, and limiting light. At all stages, dimensions and physical changes of each sample were recorded and each sample was photographed. The samples reacted to the accelerated conditions in a predictable way: the samples treated with PEG were the most reactive to increased humidity, the samples treated by freeze drying reacted to a lesser extent, and the samples treated with silicone oil did not visibly react. The resulting conditions of the samples prove that meaningful comparisons can be made between samples, even without the specialized weathering chambers used by industry.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/155088
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectconservationen
dc.subjectaccelerated testingen
dc.subjectaccelerated degradationen
dc.subjectweatheringen
dc.subjectartifactsen
dc.subjectwooden
dc.subjectconservationen
dc.subjectwaterlogged wooden
dc.subjectmuseumen
dc.subjectmuseum environmenten
dc.subjectpolyethylene glycolen
dc.subjectPEGen
dc.subjectsilicone oilen
dc.subjectfreeze dryingen
dc.titleThe Accelerated Degradation of Conserved Waterlogged Wooden
dc.typeThesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
local.etdauthor.orcid0000-0001-7877-1954
thesis.degree.departmentAnthropologyen
thesis.degree.disciplineAnthropologyen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A & M Universityen
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Artsen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MARTINDALE-THESIS-2015.pdf
Size:
1.47 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
LICENSE.txt
Size:
7.81 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: