An Evaluation of Methods to Assess Team Research Consultations
Loading...
Date
2020-05-28
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Evidence Based Library & Information Practice
Abstract
Due to the individualized nature of consultations and institutional constraints, research consultations can be challenging to assess. At Texas A&M University Libraries, subject librarians use research consultations to teach information literacy to upper-division engineering student teams working on a technical paper project. This paper describes an action research project designed to evaluate which assessment method for consultations with student teams would provide the most actionable data about the instruction and the consultation logistics as well as optimize librarian time. Each assessment method had strengths and weaknesses. The one-minute papers provided the best responses about the effectiveness of the instruction when questions were framed positively, but required the most staff buy-in to distribute. The team process interviews were time intensive, but provided an essential understanding of how students think about and prepare for each progress report. Recruiting for and scheduling the focus groups required more time and effort than the data collected about the instruction and logistics warranted. The questionnaire provided student perspectives about their learning after the assignment had been completed, collected feedback about the logistics of the consultations, was easy to modify each semester, and required minimal librarian time.
The questionnaire, which allowed us to collect data on the instruction and consultation logistics, was the most suitable assessment method for us.
Description
Keywords
assessment, research consultations; student teams
Citation
Kogut, A., & Melgoza, P. (2020). An Evaluation of Methods to Assess Team Research Consultations. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 15(3), 36-58. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29698