NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
Neuropsychological profiles of cortical and subcortical dementia: underlying constructs and group differences
dc.creator | Hemmy, Laura Sue | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-07T23:05:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-07T23:05:09Z | |
dc.date.created | 2001 | |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2001-THESIS-H456 | |
dc.description | Due to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item. | en |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references (leaves 45-57). | en |
dc.description | Issued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Neuropsychological assessment is frequently used to aid in the differential diagnosis of dementia. In support of this practice, previous investigators have found distinguishable patterns of deficit on neuropsychological tests in patients with dementia syndromes resulting from different neuropathology. A key distinction proposed is one between the patterns of deficit seen in patients with temporo-parietal cortical dementias (e.g. Alzheimer's disease) versus those with frontal-subcortical dementias (e.g. Huntington's disease). However, research addressing the correspondence of neuropsychological test data to specific anatomical markers of dysfunction has not been conclusive. This study addressed the validity of interpreting neuropsychological test data as indicators of neuropathology, specifically evaluating the ability to distinguish between fronto-subcortical and non-frontal cortical patterns of deficit. Comparison of five models in a confirmatory factor analysis did not find an adequate fit for models based upon anatomical systems of dysfunction, and a cluster analysis found two naturally existing groups reflecting differences in general cognitive ability. Recommendations for future research addressing the cortical versus subcortical distinction are made. | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Texas A&M University | |
dc.rights | This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use. | en |
dc.subject | psychology. | en |
dc.subject | Major psychology. | en |
dc.title | Neuropsychological profiles of cortical and subcortical dementia: underlying constructs and group differences | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | psychology | en |
thesis.degree.name | M.S. | en |
thesis.degree.level | Masters | en |
dc.type.genre | thesis | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | reformatted digital | en |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.