NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
Information transfer between dissimilar areal units: a comparison between areal weighting and the dasymetric method
dc.creator | Guerry, Melyssa Clara | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-07T22:55:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-07T22:55:50Z | |
dc.date.created | 1999 | |
dc.date.issued | 1999 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1999-THESIS-G8 | |
dc.description | Due to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item. | en |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references (leaves 53-57). | en |
dc.description | Issued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics. | en |
dc.description.abstract | When information is available in areal units not compatible with the study area boundaries, the values must be transferred between these dissimilar polygons. Areal interpolation is the technique used to calculate these values and the most common interpolation method areal weighting, while simple and integrated into most GIS packages, is the least accurate for human population distributions. As shown in previous studies, the more accurate alternative to areal weighting is the dasymetric method. This paper describes a variation of the dasymetric, called Land Use Apportionment, as used within a GIS system. In the example of transferring human population totals from Texas county outlines to Texas major river basins, it is shown that differences between interpolation calculations do arise. Factors accounting for these differences can include surface characteristics of the area, scale between the source and target zones, geometric features of the target area and the quality of information. In this study, the surface characteristics and information quality had the most effect on calculations. Considerations when deciding which method to use are level of acceptable error, surface characteristics, scale, information quality and procedural requirements of the methods. | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Texas A&M University | |
dc.rights | This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use. | en |
dc.subject | geography. | en |
dc.subject | Major geography. | en |
dc.title | Information transfer between dissimilar areal units: a comparison between areal weighting and the dasymetric method | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | geography | en |
thesis.degree.name | M.S. | en |
thesis.degree.level | Masters | en |
dc.type.genre | thesis | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | reformatted digital | en |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.