Show simple item record

dc.creatorMoritz, Wendy Lee
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:37:35Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:37:35Z
dc.date.created1994
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1994-THESIS-M862
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en
dc.description.abstractIncreased capital requirements and reduced profit margins have restricted farmers' borrowing and repayment capabilities. Many states have initiated beginning farmer financial assistance programs targeted towards potential farmers having difficulty obtaining debt capital from traditional sources. Such programs provide easier access to credit for beginning farmers through lower-cost credit and reduced principal obligations. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of beginning farmer operating loan financing versus conventional lending on Brazos and Jackson County farm operations. Measures used to evaluate the financial performance of the various scenarios include: expected ending equity position, variability of ending equity position, expected profitability, variation of expected profitability, loan performance, and probability of failure. FmHA's special beginning farmer operating loan is chosen to evaluate beginning farmer financing since it incorporates common characteristics of the state programs and is applicable to Texas farmers. The main differences between FMHA and conventional financing are lower interest costs and the availability of funds. The recursive, whole-farm, simulation model, ARFSIM, is selected for use in the study. The results indicate that FMHA financing benefit both the Brazos and Jackson County operations by improving availability of credit and reducing interest expense, thus allowing them to achieve higher net income levels, ending net worth levels, credit scores and greater probability of survival. Two sensitivity analyses are also performed. When the operations are supported with non-farm income, chances of survival are increased and overall performance improves. There are only slight differences between FMHA and conventional financing results under this scenario. When the farms incur a decrease in the overall level of prices, their chances of survival greatly decrease making it difficult for the operations to be profitable under either financing option. The use of FMHA financing results in better financial performance and chances of survival than with conventional financing. However, decreases in agricultural commodity price levels may reduce profit margins to a level that limits the sustainability of new entrants in production agriculture regardless of financing alternatives.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectagricultural economics.en
dc.subjectMajor agricultural economics.en
dc.titleThe evaluation of beginning farmer program financing on Texas corn, cotton, and sorghum operationsen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineagricultural economicsen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access