NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
Growth machine theory: a qualitative analysis
|dc.creator||Smith, Gavin Paul|
|dc.description||Due to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to email@example.com, referencing the URI of the item.||en|
|dc.description||Includes bibliographical references.||en|
|dc.description.abstract||Growth machine theory (Molotch 1976; Logan and Molotch 1987) represents a significant contribution to the study of urban development. It is hypothesized however, that the theory can be expanded, making it more applicable to modern urban settings. Growth machine theory assumes growth is controlled by an elite group of land-based interests, whose manipulation of land serves to increase the property values of land holders in the growth coalition. The "land-based rentier elite" works to create a "growth consensus" among a wide array of local business interests and politicians who benefit from the proceeds of urban growth. Logan and Molotch also acknowledge the negative impacts of growth, citing those communities that are unable to effectively combat unrestrained development. The ensuing conflicts typically result in the growth machine's domination of growth politics, and potentially, the rise of a powerful anti-growth coalition. It is hypothesized in this thesis that the conflicting valuation of land inherent in growth machine theory, does not necessarily result in a dialectic, win-lose situation. Furthermore, it is argued that the growth coalition may not always ado t a unidimensional roach to development where further growth and the capturing of additional profits is the only force behind the growth machine's actions. The historical development of Clear Lake City, Texas and the analysis of a major land developer (Friendswood Development Company) responsible for the city's growth will serve as a model to test three hypotheses, including two which are not addressed by growth machine theory. The three hypotheses to be tested include: 1) Friendswood Development Company does exemplify the basic dimensions found in growth machine theory concerning the characteristics of a "land-based rentier elite" which is the force initiating and perpetuating growth; 2) Land-based elites will take actions that are not directly associated with the construction of projects in order to deal with the concerns of potential anti-growth groups prior to the development of formalized opposition; and 3) Land-based elites will over time voluntarily develop multiple goals that reduce their pursuit of a single set of profit-oriented goals.||en|
|dc.publisher||Texas A&M University|
|dc.rights||This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.||en|
|dc.title||Growth machine theory: a qualitative analysis||en|
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.