Show simple item record

Visit the Energy Systems Laboratory Homepage.

dc.creatorNiwa, H.
dc.creatorNakahara, N.
dc.creatorOkumiya, M.
dc.creatorSuganaga, M.
dc.creatorTanaka, H.
dc.creatorPan, S.
dc.creatorWatanabe, T.
dc.creatorZheng, M.
dc.date.accessioned2007-04-27T16:44:17Z
dc.date.available2007-04-27T16:44:17Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.otherESL-IC-04-10-62
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/5091
dc.description.abstractResults of comparative study for five typical simulation programs (HASP/ACSS, EnergyPlus, DOE-2, Dest and HVACSIM+(J) are discussed using. a certain reference model of an actual building. The maximum and annual cooling and heating loads and annual energy consumption are compared. Efforts were made to make calculation conditions coincide with each other, but it was not always completely successful due to specific character of algorithms included in each program, so that calculation results differed a little with each other and with actual results. Several case studies have been carried out for each program how design parameters and/or control strategies result on energy consumption and/or indoor environment, which proved availability of each program for commissioning use in various phases depending on their characteristics.en
dc.format.extent499231 bytesen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherEnergy Systems Laboratory (http://esl.tamu.edu)en
dc.publisherTexas A&M University (http://www.tamu.edu)en
dc.subjectenergy/environment commissioningen
dc.subjectHVAC systems simulationen
dc.subjectcomparative studyen
dc.titleComparative Study of Availability on Energy/Environment Commissioning Using Existing HVAC Simulation Programs for a Model Buildingen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record