dc.creator | Tabacaru, Simona | |
dc.creator | Hartnett, Eric | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-20T14:22:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-20T14:22:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-05-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Hartnett, Eric and Simona Tabacaru. “A Tale of Two Discovery and Citation Analysis Tools: A QQ Comparison of Web of Science and Scopus.” Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML), Florence, Italy, May 30, 2019. | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/177769 | |
dc.description.abstract | For many years, the Texas A&M University Libraries have subscribed to both Scopus and Web of Science, two similar discovery and citation analysis products often used to measure research impact. Following some changes to the Libraries’ materials budget, the authors were asked to analyze the two products to determine whether one was preferable to the other. To accomplish this task the authors took a two-fold approach combining quantitative data, like citation, usage, and title overlap analysis, with qualitative data gathered by surveying faculty and other stakeholders. The authors’ findings, which were a bit surprising, are presented in this poster. | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | The 11th Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries International Conference (QQML 2019) | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ | |
dc.subject | Web of Science, Scopus, product comparison, quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis | en |
dc.title | A Tale of Two Discovery and Citation Analysis Tools: A QQ Comparison of Web of Science and Scopus | en |
dc.type | Presentation | en |
local.department | University Libraries | en |