Show simple item record

dc.creatorKnostman, Jacob W
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-10T16:17:53Z
dc.date.available2019-06-10T16:17:53Z
dc.date.created2020-05
dc.date.submittedMay 2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/175460
dc.description.abstractThe quality of a coach-athlete relationship has been found to predict on field performance, as well as levels of academic self-efficacy, self-regulation, and aggression in athletes (Jowett, 2017; Nicholls et. al., 2017; Worthy, 2018). Previous research has also indicated that learning style preferences are influenced by ethnicity, regardless of socioeconomic status (Banks, 1988). Despite establishing that the quality of an athlete’s relationship with their coach can have a profound impact for the athlete both on and off the field, and that there are cultural differences in how people view and learn about the world, little is known about the impacts that an athlete’s race/ethnicity may have on the effectiveness of different coaching attributes, styles, and/or techniques. This study aims to provide insight into this gap in knowledge by administering a survey to athletes at Texas A&M that consists of a shortened version of the Leadership Scale for Sport (SLSS; Chelludurai, 1980; Chiu, Rodriguez, & Won, 2016), which asked about an athlete’s preferences regarding their coach’s approaches to training/instruction, democratic behavior, autocratic behavior, social support, and positive feedback. Also included in the survey were short response questions that were formulated to discover any differences that may exist between racial/ethnic groups in coaching preference not covered by the SLSS. Based on prior research on cultural worldviews (Komarraju & Cokley, 2008), we hypothesized that athletes of color would prefer social support and democratic behavior from their coaches more frequently than white athletes, and white athletes will prefer autocratic behavior from their coaches more. SLSS data supported our hypothesis that athletes of color would prefer social support more often than white athletes, however, no significant differences were found on the leadership dimensions of democratic and autocratic behavior. Potential explanations for this lack of significance are discussed. Additionally, the term Athletic Racial Profiling is proposed to describe instances in which overgeneralizations about particular racial or ethnic groups are applied universally to individual athletes within those groups.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.subjectSportsen
dc.subjectSports Psychologyen
dc.subjectCoach-Athlete Relationshipen
dc.subjectRaceen
dc.subjectEthnicityen
dc.subjectRace and Ethnicityen
dc.subjectSocial Psychologyen
dc.subjectCoachingen
dc.subjectCoaching Preferencesen
dc.subjectRacial Profilingen
dc.subjectRacial and Ethnic Differencesen
dc.titleRace and Ethnicity in the Coach-Athlete Relationship: Coaching Attributes Effect on Athletesen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentPsychologyen
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychologyen
thesis.degree.grantorUndergraduate Research Scholars Programen
thesis.degree.nameBSen
thesis.degree.levelUndergraduateen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSalter, Phia
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.date.updated2019-06-10T16:17:53Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record