Show simple item record

dc.creatorJohnston, Janet R
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-15T21:45:39Z
dc.date.available2015-08-15T21:45:39Z
dc.date.issued2015-08-15
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/154796
dc.description.abstractThe author develops a theory, both discursively and formally, of communication ambiguity that can result in the three situations of the title. In a dependent relationship, such as parent-child or teacher-student, an ambiguous message is likely to make prior role relationships salient, and to be interpreted in terms of those roles. For instance, if a child does not understand a teacher’s instructions, the child is likely to fall back upon role-determined beliefs about the teacher’s general values and actions. The process results in stereotyped interactions and often, to undesirable attributions. A different application of the theory of how role relations develop is available (Johnston 1988).en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTechnical Report Stanford Sociology;#55
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United Statesen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
dc.subjectscapegoatingen
dc.subjectcommunication ambiguityen
dc.titleInvestigation of Pseudo-Mutuality, Double Binding and Scapegoating: An Expectation States Approach.en
dc.typeTechnical Reporten
local.departmentSociologyen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 United States