Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorChoudhury, Iftekharuddin M.en_US
dc.creatorBalabadhrapatruni, Aswinien_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-16T15:57:18Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-16T20:30:19Z
dc.date.available2012-07-16T15:57:18Zen_US
dc.date.available2012-07-16T20:30:19Z
dc.date.created2011-05en_US
dc.date.issued2012-07-16en_US
dc.date.submittedMay 2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2011-05-9443en_US
dc.description.abstractBuilding Integrated Photo Voltaics (BIPVs) are devices which are manufactured to replace building components exposed to sufficient sunlight to generate energy. Photo Voltaic Roof tiles are Building Integrated components which can be used instead of traditional roofing materials. The following thesis is focused on comparing traditional, cheaper asphalt roof tiles with Photo Voltaic (PV) roofing tiles in terms of energy cost savings during their respective Net Present Values. The method used for achieving this is computer simulation made possible by software named "Solar Advisory Model" (SAM), developed by National Renewable Energy Laboratories (NREL), to simulate energy output and resultant energy costs saved. The simulations have been run on a prototype example of a model of a dwelling unit's roof area. The simulations have been repeated for 35 cities all over the U.S.A. for 5 different climatic zones on the same prototype example of the dwelling unit. Similarly, the roof area being laid with an array of PV roof tiles has been estimated for coverage by traditional asphalt roof shingles by using data from the RS Means construction costs data. The estimated costs associated with the asphalt roof area have been adjusted to a different set of 35 locations from the 5 climatic zones by using the location factor from RS Means. A statistical analysis was done to analyze the data, net present value of roofing materials being the dependent variable versus climatic zones and roofing material as the independent variables. The statistical model also included CDD (Cooling Degree Days) and HDD (Heating Degree Days) as co-variates. The results indicate that NPV (Net Present Value) of BIPV roof is significantly different from that of asphalt roof. Another statistical analysis was done to determine the effect of climatic zones on energy savings due to the use of BIPV roofing. Energy savings (in US$) was used as a dependent variable, and climatic zone as the independent variable. HDD AND CDD were also included in this model as co-variates. The results of this test indicate that both climatic zone and HDD have an effect on total energy savings.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectArrayen_US
dc.subjectAzimuthen_US
dc.subjectBIPVen_US
dc.subjectCDDen_US
dc.subjectDC namplete ratingen_US
dc.subjectDC to AC derate factoren_US
dc.subjectE costsen_US
dc.subjectE savingsen_US
dc.subjectHDDen_US
dc.subjectInverteren_US
dc.subjectNRELen_US
dc.subjectNPVen_US
dc.subjectOMRen_US
dc.subjectPVen_US
dc.subjectSAMen_US
dc.titleResidential Use of Building Integrated Photo Voltaicsen_US
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentConstruction Scienceen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineConstruction Managementen_US
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen_US
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLavy, Sarelen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSinha, Samiranen_US
dc.type.genrethesisen_US
dc.type.materialtexten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record