Show simple item record

dc.creatorBriggeman, Brian C.
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T23:12:07Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T23:12:07Z
dc.date.created2002
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2002-THESIS-B75
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 97-99).en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractThis study addresses the decision to eat processed and fresh pork in the at-home and away-from-home markets using qualitative choice (logit) models. Results were found by using data from consumer diaries that monitored national eating trends. These diaries were distributed and collected over the years 1997 to 2001 by the National Panel Diary. There were about 15,000 diaries that were considered in this study. The characteristics considered showed differences in the decision to eat processed and fresh pork in the at-home and away-from-home markets. Sociodemographic and economic factors (household income, age of female head, household size, sex of eater, race, ethnicity, region and market size), health indicators (dietary status and body mass index), characteristics of the female head (age, employment and education), seasonality and price were hypothesized to influence the decision to eat pork. Seasonal differences were evident given the results. Individuals have a lower probability of consumption if they are dieting; their associated female head is more academically educated; and they live in a SMSA of 2.5 million or more. Individuals have a higher probability of consumption if they are male; their associated female head is older than 50; they are from a larger household size; they are older; they have a higher body mass index; and they live in a non-SMSA. Orientals show the highest probability of consuming fresh pork both at home and away from home. Regional differences are noted with the Pacific region showing the lowest likelihood of consumption. Income is found to be a significant factor; however, it has a minimal economic impact. These results are further validated through the use of prediction success tables and through the out-of-sample testing of the 2001 data. Also, a discussion of cutoff values and an optimal cutoff value is considered for the prediction success tables. This research benefits the National Pork Board and the pork industry by showing areas to target with the development and implementation of marketing strategies.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectagricultural economics.en
dc.subjectMajor agricultural economics.en
dc.titleConsumers of fresh and processed pork in the at-home and away-from-home marketsen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineagricultural economicsen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access