NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
Perceptions of livestock producers, forage producers, wildlife managers, and forage-based service providers concerning extension and technology-transfer activities in south Texas and northeast Mexico
MetadataShow full item record
The purpose of this bi-national study was to determine the type, nature, and extent of existing extension and technology-transfer activities provided to livestock producers, forage producers, and wildlife managers in south Texas and three states of northeast Mexico. The researcher from Texas A&M University and a co-principal investigator from Tamaulipas, Mexico worked together to conduct the study on both sides of the border. Conclusions were drawn to provide suggestions about opportunities for increased effectiveness and collaboration among forage-based service providers. Data were collected from two samples in Spring and Summer 2001 using questionnaires. A sample of 92 livestock producers, forage producers, and wildlife managers was selected from south Texas and northeast Mexico. The second sample consisted of 44 individuals and organizations that provided services for livestock producers, forage producers, and wildlife managers in the region. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to collect and analyze data. The following were among the findings. The most common types of activities offered by forage-based service providers in the private sector were sales, credit, and veterinary services. Among service providers in the public sector, the most common types of services included animal management practices and forage/plant production practices. Service providers used a combination of mass media and interpersonal channels of communication. In south Texas, livestock producers, forage producers, and wildlife managers most commonly used information from government or university sources. In northeast Mexico, the most commonly used sources of information were unions or associations. The most trusted sources of information for the overall region were government and university sources, friends or other producers, and unions or associations. Producers more commonly used interpersonal channels of communication than mass media channels. Recommendations were made based on these findings for use by individuals and organizations seeking to effect change among livestock producers, forage producers, and wildlife managers in south Texas and northeast Mexico.
DescriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to email@example.com, referencing the URI of the item.
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 82-84).
Issued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.
Folsom, Wendy Ann (2001). Perceptions of livestock producers, forage producers, wildlife managers, and forage-based service providers concerning extension and technology-transfer activities in south Texas and northeast Mexico. Master's thesis, Texas A&M University. Available electronically from
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.