Show simple item record

dc.creatorCook, Christopher J
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T23:03:27Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T23:03:27Z
dc.date.created2001
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2001-THESIS-C66
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 174-183).en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractScandinavian maritime archaeologists are in agreement that the ship functioned as a powerful symbol for the peoples of the Bronze, Iron and Viking Ages, largely as an outgrowth of the nature of their seafaring society. This symbolism is a mature exemplification of 'maritimity', the conceptual process whereby the sum of cultural adaptations made by a coastal population becomes imbued with meaning. It is hypothesized that this conceptualization of maritimity began as early as the Mesolithic and that the rich, elaborate symbolism involving ships evident in later prehistoric Scandinavia developed in a continuous progression from these Stone Age antecedents. It is posited that this concept of maritimity and its development provided the template that ultimately enabled the ship to rise to its position of symbolic prominence. It is argued that conceptual categories, such as maritimity, form as the result of the feedback generated between the environment and a population's adaptation to it. By examining aspects of Mesolithic settlement and subsistence systems from southern Scandinavia, maritimity is shown to be operating as a functioning category of conceptualization among prehistoric coastally adapted populations. Furthermore this is then used to illuminate aspects of Mesolithic art and ornamentation to provide an interpretive framework for reconstructing their meaning. Additionally, it is felt that the investigation of meaning need no longer be the enterprise of the philosopher but that a proper perspective and focused methodology can enable progress to be made towards an empirical investigation of meaning.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectanthropology.en
dc.subjectMajor anthropology.en
dc.titleMaritimity in prehistoric Scandinavia: cognitive domain formation and the reconstruction of a Mesolithic mindseten
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineanthropologyen
thesis.degree.nameM.A.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access