Show simple item record

dc.creatorKamps, Ray Herbert
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:45:11Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:45:11Z
dc.date.created1996
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1996-THESIS-K34
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references: p. 43-49.en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractThree experiments were performed with 3-mm floating plastic beads as substrate in 15 miniature aquaculture biofilters. The biofilters were fed nutrients to simulate aquaculture conditions and manipulated to encourage eitherautotrophicnitrification or heterotrophic bioassimilation of ammonia. Treatments in the first experiment were biofiltration without beads, biofiltration with smooth (as manufactured) beads, and biofiltration with severely scratched beads; each treatment was replicated 5 times. For the second experiment, the treatment involving biofiltration without beads was replaced by smooth-bead biofiltration and subjected to organic loading with glucose to give a C:N molar ratio of 19.9:1. It was hypothesized that this would effect the bioassimilation of the ammonia into heterotropic microbial biomass. The third experiment repeated the second, except the C:N molar ratio was decreased to 6.6:1. Results indicated that the presence of beads (either smooth or rough) in the biofilter significantly enhanced nitrification over that with empty biofilters (p<0.01). Rough beads provided a small, though statistically significant, improvement in nitrification over smooth beads in all three experiments (p<0.01). When compared with biofilters which did not receive an organic load, the glucose-loaded biofilters tended to accumulate more biomass. However, that the difference in the fraction of ammonia converted to biomass was non-significant indicates that a third process, heterotrophic nitrification-denitrification, was occurring as well. A C:N ratio of 19.9:1 greatly accelerated the removal of ammonia without accumulation of nitrate. A C:N ratio of 6.6:1 resulted in a small, non-significant improvement in ammonia conversion and a lesser accumulation of nitrate.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectwildlife and fisheries sciences.en
dc.subjectMajor wildlife and fisheries sciences.en
dc.titleBioassimilation versus nitrification for the removal of ammonia in aquaculture biofiltersen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinewildlife and fisheries sciencesen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access