Show simple item record

dc.creatorChapman, Dan Lynn
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:44:04Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:44:04Z
dc.date.created1996
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1996-THESIS-C4353
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references: p. 48-53.en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractThe effects of three soil aerators on trunk growth, yield, nut size, and percent kernel of pecan were studied at Frio, Medina, and San Saba Counties in Texas in 1993 and 1994. A complete randomized block design was used in each location to compare three different types of soil aeration equipment to a control. The Frio County study contained six replications on four 'Wichita' trees per treatment. The Medina County study contained seven replications on three 'Wichita' trees per treatment. The San Saba County study contained six replications on two 'Western' trees per treatment. The treatments included (A) Guin Root Feeder; (B) Savage aerator; (C) Aerway aerator; and (D) control, no treatment. The Guin Root Feeder is a manually-operated pneumatic aerator which injects air 15 cm into the soil. Each treated tree received 16 injections equally spaced in a 2 m square block design. The Savage aerator has 12 crescent-shaped spikes, arranged in three rows, which slices the soil every 70.78 cm to a depth of 40.6 cm. The model used in this study was 2.29 m wide. Each treated tree had three passes on two sides. The Aerway aerator has sixteen spikes, 1.27 cm thick by 20.3 cm in length, spaced 10.2 cm and mounted on two spindles. The model used in this study was the 1.7 m model with a wheel kit. Each treated tree had three passes on two sides. Treatments were applied and trunk diameters were measured in mid-May 1993 and 1994 at each location. In the fall of each year nut samples were collected from each treatment block, and nut yield was measured and analyzed for quality. Results of this study indicate that for these two years soil aeration did not increase trunk growth, nut yield, or quality. This could have been the result of a detrimental increase in water infiltration that saturated the clay soils and may have possibly destroyed roots since internal drainage was restricted. This study did continue for a third year and should give a better indication of effects of soil aeration on pecan.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjecthorticulture.en
dc.subjectMajor horticulture.en
dc.titleEffects of soil areation on trunk growth, yield and nut quality of pecanen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinehorticultureen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access