Show simple item record

dc.creatorReshamwala, Sultanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:38:10Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:38:10Z
dc.date.created1994en_US
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1994-THESIS-R4333en_US
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to two value-added products, microbial biomass protein (MBP) and ethanol, was studied. Bagasse (BAG) was hydrolyzed by Phanarochaete chtysosporium. Excess sugars were utilized by a diazotrophic bacteria, Azotobacter vinelandii resulting in 15% crude protein (CP, dry substrate basis) for AFEX-treated BAG, a 300% increase over untreated, Pchrysosporium inoculated, BAG (5% CP). AFEX-treated BAG was also hydrolyzed by commercial enzymes followed by A. vine/andii fermentation resulting in 20% CP (dry substrate basis), a 2000% increase over untreated BAG (1 % CP). Fermentations with high solids ratios and no agitation provided the most economically attractive MBP production method. Essential amino acid profiles of the final products satisfied FAO/WHO requirements except for lysine. Ethanol fermentations were conducted with (AFEX-treated and untreated) switchgrass (SWG), coastal bermudagrass (CBG), and BAG. Hydrolysis was conducted with commercial enzymes, and a crude enzymes lysate from cultures of three microorganisms. A genetically-engineered Klebsiella oxytoca fermented sugars to ethanol. Glucose was rapidly fermented to ethanol. Xylose utilization was slower and incomplete with greater inefficiencies at higher sugar concentrations. For commercial enzymes hydrolysis and Koxytoca fermentation, based on experimental yields, about 220 L ethanol could be produced per ton AFEX treated SWG, versus 90 L ethanol per ton untreated SWG. Protein extraction did not hinder ethanol fermentation. About 250 L, 205 L, and 1 08 L ethanol could be produced per ton protein-extracted (AFEX) CBG, non-extracted (AFEX) CBG and untreated CBG respectively. Ethanol yields from BAG corresponded to production of 222 L ethanol per ton BAG. With crude enzymes hydrolysis and Koxytoca fermentation, experimental yields could lead to ethanol production of 240 L, 207 L and 153 L per ton of SWG, CBG and BAG respectively. Crude enzymes activity was 11.4 IU/ml corresponding to an enzyme loading of 11.4 IU/g substrate compared to 5 IU/g substrate for commercial enzymes. Crude enzymes compared favorably with commercial enzymes in terms of reducing sugars and ethanol yields. The research provided a sound basis for future work in biomass conversion systems to fuel and feed. The efficacy of AFEX-treatment on lignocellulosic materials was amply demonstrated.en_US
dc.format.mediumelectronicen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M Universityen_US
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en_US
dc.subjectchemical engineering.en_US
dc.subjectMajor chemical engineering.en_US
dc.titleThe conversion of biomass to ethanol and microbial biomass proteinen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplinechemical engineeringen_US
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en_US
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_US
dc.type.genrethesis
dc.type.materialtexten_US
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access