NOTE: Restrictions are in place to limit access to one or more of the files associated with this item. Authorized users must log in to gain access. Non-authorized users do not have access to these files.
Visit the Energy Systems Laboratory Homepage.
| dc.creator | Kennon, M. K. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-04-07T19:03:43Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2011-04-07T19:03:43Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1982 | |
| dc.identifier.other | ESL-IE-82-04-157 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/94271 | |
| dc.description.abstract | For most of their lives engineers have used one or another version of the 'crack method' to analyze infiltration. They know its limitations. In many applications, it's grossly and obviously in error. For many industrial problems it's simply not relevant. Infiltration is a result of the interaction of a number of variables. The crack method is based only on wind pressure and the size of the opening. It works as long as the other variables are in a 'normal' relationship with each other. When the variables deviate from the norm, substantial errors occur. | en |
| dc.publisher | Energy Systems Laboratory (http://esl.tamu.edu) | |
| dc.publisher | Texas A&M University (http://www.tamu.edu) | |
| dc.subject | Industrial Infiltration | en |
| dc.subject | Infiltration Evaluation Method | en |
| dc.subject | Computer-Based Model | en |
| dc.title | Industrial Infiltration | en |
| dc.contributor.sponsor | The King Company |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
IETC - Industrial Energy Technology Conference
Industrial Energy Technology Conference