Show simple item record

Visit the Energy Systems Laboratory Homepage.

dc.creatorChappell, R. N.
dc.creatorBliem, C. J.
dc.creatorMills, J. I.
dc.creatorDemuth, O. J.
dc.creatorPlaster, D. S.
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-09T16:16:36Z
dc.date.available2011-02-09T16:16:36Z
dc.date.issued1985-05
dc.identifier.otherESL-IE-85-05-113
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/93383
dc.description.abstractMany potentially beneficial applications for industrial heat pumps are not being pursued because of confusion regarding both energy savings and economics. Part of this confusion stems from the variety of heat pumps available and the fact that the measure of merit, the coefficient of performance (COP) is commonly defined in at least three different ways. In an attempt to circumvent this problem, a simple categorization was developed based on the commonly accepted COP definitions. Using this categorization, the cost of recovering waste energy with heat pumps was examined. Examples were evaluated in which the cost of energy delivered was calculated based on estimates of capital cost, operating costs, and maintenance costs. Heat pumps from the various categories were then compared on the basis of economics.en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherEnergy Systems Laboratory (http://esl.tamu.edu)
dc.subjectIndustrial Heat Pumpsen
dc.subjectEnergy Savings Evaluationsen
dc.subjectEconomicsen
dc.titleIndustrial Heat Pumps--Types and Costsen
dc.typePresentationen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record