NOTE: Restrictions are in place to limit access to one or more of the files associated with this item. Authorized users must log in to gain access. Non-authorized users do not have access to these files.
Visit the Energy Systems Laboratory Homepage.
| dc.creator | Chung, C. W. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-12-06T15:47:57Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-12-06T15:47:57Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1985-05 | |
| dc.identifier.other | ESL-IE-85-05-11 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/93109 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Two level demand makes it possible to use two systems for refrigeration and save energy and money. An example of this type of refrigeration, consisting of an ammonia absorption refrigeration (AAR) unit and a mechanical compression refrigeration (MCR) unit, is presented in this article. This paper will briefly describe process configuration, advantages and utility consumption, equipment cost and direct field cost comparisons of such a hybrid refrigeration unit over its counterpart, a cascading MCR unit, in a Rectisol application. | en |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Energy System Laboratory (http://esl.tamu.edu) | |
| dc.subject | Hybrid Refrigeration | en |
| dc.subject | Ammonia Absorption Refrigeration (AAR) | en |
| dc.subject | Mechanical Compression Refrigeration (MCR) | en |
| dc.title | Save with Hybrid Refrigeration | en |
| dc.type | Presentation | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
IETC - Industrial Energy Technology Conference
Industrial Energy Technology Conference