NOTE: Restrictions are in place to limit access to one or more of the files associated with this item. Authorized users must log in to gain access. Non-authorized users do not have access to these files.
Visit the Energy Systems Laboratory Homepage.
| dc.creator | Muller, M. R. | |
| dc.creator | Barnish, T. | |
| dc.creator | Polomski, P. P. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-07-22T15:09:29Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-07-22T15:09:29Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1995-04 | |
| dc.identifier.other | ESL-IE-95-04-25 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/91330 | |
| dc.description.abstract | A survey of 104 manufacturers has been carried out. Each plant had received an energy audit by an EADC at least 24 months prior to the study. The survey attempted to determine why certain recommendations made in the audit report were not implemented. Several interesting results were obtained. Of most importance is the observation that many of the companies eventually implemented recommendations which were initially rejected. Also, the acceptable simple payback for energy conserving measures varies inversely with yearly energy costs. Finally, a clear correlation between the level of training of plant personnel and the sophistication of solutions to energy problems is clearly demonstrated. | en |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Energy Systems Laboratory (http://esl.tamu.edu) | |
| dc.subject | Industrial Energy Audit | en |
| dc.subject | Implementation Trends | en |
| dc.title | On Decision Making Following an Industrial Energy Audit | en |
| dc.type | Presentation | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
IETC - Industrial Energy Technology Conference
Industrial Energy Technology Conference