Visit the Energy Systems Laboratory Homepage.
dc.creator | Salbodkin, A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-05-16T16:15:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2008-05-16T16:15:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1990 | |
dc.identifier.other | ESL-HH-90-10-22 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/6612 | |
dc.description.abstract | The use of thermal storage, by its very nature, requires a large storage vessel. Depending upon the technology employed, this can vary from as little as 1.6cuft./ton-hour, up to 15cuft./ton-hour. The result can be storage tanks with volumes into the millions of gallons. The majority of the technologies on the market today employ an atmospheric (open) storage tank, while a limited number use a closed storage tank, operating at system pressure. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the relative advantages and disadvantages of both methods. The comparison will encompass the following: 1. Equipment and Installation Costs 2. Mechanical Design 3. Pumping Requirements 4. Control Requirements 5. Water Treatment | en |
dc.publisher | Energy Systems Laboratory (http://esl.tamu.edu) | |
dc.publisher | Texas A&M University (http://www.tamu.edu) | |
dc.title | A Comparison of Open Versus Closed Systems in Thermal Storage Applications | en |
dc.contributor.sponsor | Carrier Southern California |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
H&H - Symposium on Improving Building Systems in Hot and Humid Climates
Symposium on Improving Building Systems in Hot and Humid Climates