The full text of this item is not available at this time because the student has placed this item under an embargo for a period of time. The Libraries are not authorized to provide a copy of this work during the embargo period, even for Texas A&M users with NetID.
Improving liquid chemical intervention methods to control pathogens on fresh-cut fruits and vegetables
dc.contributor.advisor | Cisneros-Zevallos, Luis | |
dc.creator | Troya, Maria Rosa | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-08-16T19:09:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-08-16T19:09:49Z | |
dc.date.created | 2003-05 | |
dc.date.issued | 2006-08-16 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/3929 | |
dc.description.abstract | Factors that affect liquid chemical intervention methods of controlling pathogens on fresh-cut produce were investigated. The relationship between produce tissue structure (intercellular space, cell size, and cell distribution) and the sanitizing effectiveness of liquid chemical treatment was studied. Experiments determined if sanitizer contact with bacteria could be improved through the use of surfactants and different application methods (drop application method, negative pressure differential, and sonication). To test these factors, a model sanitizer, H2O2, and a model microorganism: Salmonella Typhimurium, along with various fresh-cut produce (apple, pear, carrot, and potato) were tested. Microscopic analysis revealed a very complicated pore structure consisting of irregular capillaries. S. Typhimurium was found to survive in all produce tested, and washing did not significantly reduced inoculated bacteria regardless of the bacterial incubation time or produce type. The results showed that a 3% H2O2 solution reduced S. Typhimurium in produce and the solutionÂs efficiency varied in the following descending order: potato>apple>carrot>pear. In seven min treatments, bacteria were reduced by 2.5 CFU/ml in potato, 2.3 CFU/ml in apple, 1.5 CFU/ml in carrot, and 0.7 CFU/ml in pear. There was no direct evidence on how intercellular space, its percentage or cellular distribution and shape affected efficiency, but some possibilites were discussed. The rate and extent of liquid penetration, and how varying pore diameter in each cell or air space prevent complete chemical treatment penetration were also analyzed. It was determined that bacterial density has a slight effect in bacterial reduction but this depends on type of produce inoculated. The use of surfactants did not improve bacterial reduction in either washing or chemical treatments, and neither did the use of drop application method or temperature differential. On the other hand, applying the chemical treatment with a surfactant while using a sonicator did improve the treatmentÂs efficiency. This thesis provides a number of factors to be considered when designing a chemical treatment and a guideline for further research in areas such as rate and extent of liquid chemical treatment penetration into fresh-cut produce. | en |
dc.format.extent | 1683266 bytes | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Texas A&M University | |
dc.subject | Foodborne Pathogens | en |
dc.subject | Fresh-cut Produce | en |
dc.subject | Hydrogen Peroxide | en |
dc.subject | Antimicrobial Treatment | en |
dc.subject | Surfactant | en |
dc.title | Improving liquid chemical intervention methods to control pathogens on fresh-cut fruits and vegetables | en |
dc.type | Book | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.department | Horticultural Sciences | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | Food Science and Technology | en |
thesis.degree.grantor | Texas A&M University | en |
thesis.degree.name | Master of Science | en |
thesis.degree.level | Masters | en |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Acuff, Gary | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Richter, Ronald | |
dc.type.genre | Electronic Thesis | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | born digital | en |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Electronic Theses, Dissertations, and Records of Study (2002– )
Texas A&M University Theses, Dissertations, and Records of Study (2002– )