Show simple item record

dc.creatorBraman, Sandra
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-13T20:10:52Z
dc.date.available2019-11-13T20:10:52Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Communication, 8(2014), 2603-2618en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/186125
dc.description.abstractBecause autonomous networks such as WikiLeaks have no presence in US law as legal subjects, the US government struggled to identify the legal subject during the trial of Bradley Manning (now Chelsea Manning) that led to the conviction of Manning for illegal release of classified information to WikiLeaks. This article analyzes the multiple arguments used by the government to identify a legal subject, working outwards from targeting the biological individual Julian Assange as the most concrete identity for the network through multiple other approaches, winding up with anyone with an ip address that was used to look at Twitter comments on or reports about WikiLeaks.en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Communication
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Statesen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::LAW/JURISPRUDENCEen
dc.subjectinformation policy, WikiLeaks, autonomous networks, leaks, Julian Assange, Chelsea Manning, Bradley Manning, legal subjecten
dc.title"We Are Bradley Manning": Information Policy, the Legal Subject, and the WikiLeaks Complexen
dc.typeArticleen
local.departmentCommunicationen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States