Show simple item record

dc.creatorFord, Joan Butler
dc.creatorZelditch, Morris Jr
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-16T21:48:58Z
dc.date.available2017-08-16T21:48:58Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-16
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/161181
dc.description.abstracta. This WP continues the investigation in WP 84-3. There, they found that influence accepted by an actor S was negatively related to a central person’s (C) power even if S did not know how C’s preferences or how likely C was to use the power. They attempt to distinguish two explanations: (1) S infers C’s preferences and the probability that C will use the power from C’s structural position or (2) that uncertainty itself causes S to avoid action regardless of any inferences that S might make. Results of a vignette study with college student respondents generally favored the second explanation, though the authors discuss several reasons to be cautious about interfering strict similarity of results from behavioral experiments and vignettes.en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStanford Working Papers;84-10
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United Statesen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/
dc.subjectNondecision makingen
dc.titleWhy Do Individuals Nondecide under Uncertainty?en
dc.typeWorking Paperen
local.departmentSociologyen
dc.identifier.doi1984


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States