Show simple item record

dc.creatorZelditch, Morris Jr
dc.creatorGilliland, Edward
dc.creatorThomas, George M
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-16T21:41:59Z
dc.date.available2017-08-16T21:41:59Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-16
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/161180
dc.description.abstracta. The authors investigate the idea of nondecisions regarding redistributive political agenda. They focus on an idea that the greater the likelihood that a policy would redistribute resources, the less likely that policy is to reach a group’s agenda. Results of an experimental test of the idea, also involving legitimacy of the agenda-setting, were somewhat unclear. Self-interest of a gatekeeper was not the only source of actions, and overall, results were inconsistent with a purely self-interested explanation for behavior.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by NSF Grant No. SOC-7817434en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStanford Working Papers;84-9
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United Statesen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/
dc.subjectLegitimacyen
dc.subjectRedistributive Agendasen
dc.titleThe Legitimacy of Redistributive Agendasen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
local.departmentSociologyen
dc.identifier.doi1984


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States