Show simple item record

dc.creatorWu, Lawrence L.
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-16T21:28:15Z
dc.date.available2017-08-16T21:28:15Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-16
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/161178
dc.description.abstracta. Robust estimators, those procedures that distinguish likely from unlikely distributions, sometimes are preferable to either parametric or distribution-free estimations. This WP explores statistical properties of maximum likelihood estimates, or M-Estimates, which are one kind of robust estimators. Analyses and simulations show general suitability and accuracy of one class of robust estimators. The results also show that the worst estimators are the classical parametric estimators and statistical tests. The author concludes that a research loses little by using robust estimators when the data are normally distributed, and risks serious errors using parametric estimators when the data are not normally distributed.en
dc.description.sponsorshipResearch support was provided in part by National Science Foundation Grant SES80- 23542.en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStanford Working Papers;84-5
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United Statesen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/
dc.subjectRobust Estimatorsen
dc.titleA (Not So) Quick and Dirty Look at Robust M-Estimationen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
local.departmentSociologyen
dc.identifier.doi1984


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States