Show simple item record

dc.creatorRobertson, Raymond
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-16T19:36:28Z
dc.date.available2016-12-16T19:36:28Z
dc.date.issued2016-12
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/158433
dc.description.abstractThe North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which was initiated during the Republican administration of George H.W. Bush and completed during the Democrat administration of Bill Clinton, has been studied intensively since it went into effect in 1994. Although an objective review of the literature suggests that NAFTA’s overall effects have been small but positive for both Mexico and the United States, Donald Trump has called it the “worst trade agreement ever.” Others have claimed that NAFTA benefits Mexico at the expense of the United States. This brief revisits the evidence surrounding NAFTA, in particular, and free trade agreements, in general.en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMosbacher Institute for Trade, Economics & Public Policy
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 7;Issue 3
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Statesen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.subjectNAFTAen
dc.subjectfree tradeen
dc.subjectglobalizationen
dc.subjectMexico as partneren
dc.titleThe NAFTA Intellect Disconnect: Actual Costs and Benefits versus Popular Perceptionsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.sponsorBush School of Government and Public Service
local.departmentOtheren


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • The Takeaway
    Policy Briefs from the Mosbacher Institute for Trade, Economics, and Public Policy

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States