Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBass, George Fletcher
dc.contributor.advisorVan Doorninck, Frederick H.
dc.creatorFitzgerald, Michael Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-29T21:37:44Z
dc.date.available2016-09-29T21:37:44Z
dc.date.created1995-05
dc.date.issued1995-05
dc.date.submittedMay 1995
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/158155
dc.description.abstractThe hull remains and equipment of a heavy Roman merchant ship are described and illustrated, with particular attention given to construction details and features. Succeeding chapters comprise individual treatments of each construction detail of the hull and equipment, including relevant ancient literary and pictorial evidence and catalogs of all accessible comparative archaeological data. Each chapter concludes with a discussion of the feature with regard to evident technological patterns or trends and their implications for the interpretation of the Caesarea hull. The final chapters are devoted to the reconstruction, dating, and analysis of the ship in its historical, archaeological, and technological contexts. The comparative studies reveal that the ship was probably quite flat-bottomed, measured some 40-45 m in length, and is one of the most heavily built Roman merchant hulls yet documented. In this perhaps unique case, hull construction and equipment details allow the dating of the ship's construction with a fair degree of confidence. The most important product of both the documentation of the Caesarea hull and its analysis with respect to the comparative corpus may be a new hypothesis regarding Graeco-Roman shipbuilding: that approaches to the construction of large ships differed fundamentally from approaches common to the building of small ships. Due to limitations inherent in the nature of mortise-and-tenon "shell-first" shipbuilding, wherein the shell is the primary structural hull component, frames were more important in large ships than they were in small ships. Therefore, knowledge accumulated through a long history of building big ships facilitated changes to faster and more efficient methods of shipbuilding required by the deteriorating economic conditions of the later Roman and early Byzantine periods. These and other factors were part of an evolution in ship construction that resulted in "frame-first" techniques at least by the tenth or eleventh century A.C.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work. beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectMajor anthropologyen
dc.subject.lcshShips, Ancient--Israel--Caesareaen
dc.subject.lcshCaesarea (Israel)--Antiquities, Romanen
dc.subject.lcshExcavations (Archaeology--Israel--Caesareaen
dc.titleA Roman wreck at Caesarea Maritima, Israel : a comparative study of its hull and equipmenten
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentAnthropologyen
thesis.degree.disciplineAnthropologyen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A & M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSteffy, J. Richard
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKallendorf, Craig
dc.contributor.committeeMemberRaban, Avner
dc.type.materialTexten


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access