Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorTorres, Mario
dc.contributor.advisorMadsen, Jean
dc.creatorHull, Richard Donald
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-16T20:11:32Z
dc.date.available2015-08-01T05:48:31Z
dc.date.created2013-08
dc.date.issued2013-07-30
dc.date.submittedAugust 2013
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/151286
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to determine if significant differences existed in principals’ perceptions of their school’s capacity to meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) requirements between principals whose schools failed to meet AYP requirements for one year compared to principals whose schools failed to meet AYP requirements for two to four consecutive years. Additionally, responses of the principals were analyzed based on the level of school, the location of the school, and if the school was or was not a Title I campus. A total of 2,040 schools met the criteria of the study and a finite population sampling method was utilized where the entire population of eligible principals was invited to participate in the study. A quantitative online survey was distributed to principals of eligible schools. A total of 183 principals responded, for a participation rate of nearly 10%. The study utilized two statistical methods for analyzing discrete data. Independent-t tests were conducted to determine if there were statistically significant differences in principals’ perceptions of their school’s capacity between principals of schools that failed to meet AYP requirements for one year, and those that failed to meet AYP requirements for two to four consecutive years. It was found that there were not statistically significant differences in principals’ perceptions of their school’s capacity. The second method of analyzing data was to conduct two-way ANOVAs to test for statistically significant differences in perceptions of principals based on level of school, type of school, and Title I status. It was found that there were not any statistically significant differences in principals’ perceptions of their school’s capacity. The absence of statistically significant differences in principals’ perceptions of their school’s capacity to meet AYP requirements regardless of the number of years the school missed the requirements, location of the school, type of school, or Title I status of the school could reasonably lead to the conclusion that capacity domains of schools fail to predict success of schools. This however, would contradict most literature that has previously been written about school capacity. Other more reasonable conclusions, as well as future research are presented in this study.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectschool capacityen
dc.subjectleadershipen
dc.subjectNo Child Left Behinden
dc.subjecteducational policyen
dc.subjectAYPen
dc.titlePrincipal Perceptions of School Capacity to Meet Requirements of No Child Left Behinden
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentEducational Administration and Human Resource Developmenten
thesis.degree.disciplineEducational Administrationen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A & M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Educationen
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberNafukho, Fredrick
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWelch, Ben
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.date.updated2013-12-16T20:11:33Z
local.embargo.terms2015-08-01


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record